From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp002.apm-internet.net (smtp002.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.221]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D993E863C60 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 20:26:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 48818 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2021 18:26:52 -0000 X-APM-Out-ID: 16263736124881 X-APM-Authkey: 255286/0(253943/0) 1259 Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp002.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 15 Jul 2021 18:26:52 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF87380F46; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:26:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from zimbra003.verygoodemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra003.verygoodemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id sQGwX4_ELEuI; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:26:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p54ac5f03.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.172.95.3]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A03380D40; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 19:26:52 +0100 (BST) From: T H Panton Message-Id: <04852E87-1E76-458B-ACC1-E06D6901894E@pi.pe> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A20F017E-0006-46E2-A1D2-6451EEBBBD9B" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\)) In-Reply-To: <87k0lxw10s.wl-jch@irif.fr> To: Juliusz Chroboczek References: <35ECF0D3-B549-4C43-868F-58021E7F2BDD@pi.pe> <87k0lxw10s.wl-jch@irif.fr> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7) X-MailFrom: tim@pi.pe X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation Message-ID-Hash: A2DCWQVXXVKLQFCZQHWNSIY4GLYJ4JFJ X-Message-ID-Hash: A2DCWQVXXVKLQFCZQHWNSIY4GLYJ4JFJ X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 11:18:13 +0200 CC: Dave Taht , galene@lists.galene.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.4 Precedence: list Subject: [Galene] Re: using up more ports in ipv6 for better congestion control List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Gal=C3=A8ne_videoconferencing_server_discussion_list?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 18:26:54 X-Original-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 20:26:21 +0200 --Apple-Mail=_A20F017E-0006-46E2-A1D2-6451EEBBBD9B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On 11 Jul 2021, at 13:19, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >=20 > Tim, I'd be very grateful if you could explain what advantages TWCC = has > over REMB. For now, I'm sticking with REMB. I can=E2=80=99t speak from experience (I=E2=80=99ve only used REMB) - = but my sense is that the difference really kicks in when you have multiple video media streams = using the same path. So perhaps video, screen share and audio. REMB treats each stream = separately if I recall. T.= --Apple-Mail=_A20F017E-0006-46E2-A1D2-6451EEBBBD9B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

On 11 Jul 2021, at 13:19, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr> = wrote:

Tim, I'd be very grateful if you = could explain what advantages TWCC has
over REMB.  For now, I'm sticking with = REMB.

I = can=E2=80=99t speak from experience (I=E2=80=99ve only used REMB) - but = my sense is that the
difference really kicks in = when you have multiple video media streams using the same = path.
So perhaps video, screen share and audio. = REMB treats each stream separately if I recall.

T.
= --Apple-Mail=_A20F017E-0006-46E2-A1D2-6451EEBBBD9B--