From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E136F7E90C0 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:19:48 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kerneis.info header.i=@kerneis.info header.b=C4X1CMTQ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=Pdxosbno Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DEC2E2 for ; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:19:45 -0500 (EST) Received: from imap3 ([10.202.2.53]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:19:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kerneis.info; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=NTH1srLeF5XTH8KXBjkZa8WoSHj0TCP mapc03RsjA4s=; b=C4X1CMTQup0XGgIMpzq/DmXliQt8BrfPR5H5D83b8Rg3cgn u0DJOoAF95KwU49ZF1xjhspB+bYKrDgNeUs4zOZMwihCiN+sZjDosQFk2L57PzBc aLKsRFCRoAO9Pr8u1g2oKeVfCu2syRKs01fbM5X9ZSlbnRTNMdpJQoVog/EKQpMR IpQ0FsZ3FchWS5vZnRg0fXt+Y4qdVatiSfSBJslQ365Y9UGNqTDw7LDle/Atn5/h 3CKVqiKWCxJZt+3W6u57eb0SiWCe7iBt86JgzAbawpM9fbr/+WL9u01W8EPpMz/w W/ETqdwrWW981tscGq0UCfN7VuhUOrUaFEgVXGA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=NTH1sr LeF5XTH8KXBjkZa8WoSHj0TCPmapc03RsjA4s=; b=PdxosbnoyVLrmuHyrgaAy7 YQuZIHlH9Kl2ZR87ir7W2HMtxQIh7R55nFeNwrdPve7kL+MyZx8f8tu6bQjYTTcQ UTM1BKXi3imT+T4OrKTd/PAI2yyn4/Gt+fd992nrZbJmb+k9+rpX5KGsBu0CQl8K ZPTg1xHhwQ1pLq1fwGYT0Bba73kGsfIPD/r2DZDQp5JhxGqzzUwgtnoPmARK9J1M 72369px6ol4otUGanixBJYu9jKFqoJ9eK8/JSMYQWpPS4zAvTf1jGYF8bhFpNjJA 2ocYE6xlRPZS0tc+dCVZ9R2WNS0OxfObgi7mZXnfCYJ1S2C4U3TGVuhYMvObtOMQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrjeeigdehtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdfirggsrhhivghlucfmvghrnhgvihhsfdcuoehgrggsrhhi vghlsehkvghrnhgvihhsrdhinhhfoheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheduuedvueelhe dulefhjeejkeetveeljefgieejkedujeegfeffhefguddvgedtnecuffhomhgrihhnpeht rghkvghnrdhtvggrmhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehgrggsrhhivghlsehkvghrnhgvihhsrdhinhhfoh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id B9E4F420062; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 08:19:43 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-141-gf094924a34-fm-20210210.001-gf094924a Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1411faaf-6e05-459c-8fc1-523647cfa885@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87h7m86w05.wl-jch@irif.fr> References: <878s7kl6zh.fsf@toke.dk> <8735xsl1mq.fsf@toke.dk> <87lfbk6x6w.wl-jch@irif.fr> <87zh00jjnz.fsf@toke.dk> <87h7m86w05.wl-jch@irif.fr> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 14:19:23 +0100 From: "Gabriel Kerneis" To: galene@lists.galene.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-ID-Hash: T3P3DWJP4ABFJSI5XL5EXAVTF63XQZC7 X-Message-ID-Hash: T3P3DWJP4ABFJSI5XL5EXAVTF63XQZC7 X-MailFrom: gabriel@kerneis.info X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.2 Precedence: list Subject: [Galene] Re: Is the passwd file still needed? List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Gal=C3=A8ne_videoconferencing_server_discussion_list?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, 19 Feb 2021, at 14:13, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > > Well personally I can live without (4). The obvious answer that comes to > > mind to implement it is user groups, though. > > I like the idea. But the term "group" is already taken. "Team"? > "Clique"? "Cabal"? "Club"? If breaking changes are still possible, I'd go with "group" for this concept, and "room" for the current groups. Otherwise, be explicit and go with "user_group". -- Gabriel