From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=skoll.ca (client-ip=144.217.161.9; helo=dianne.skoll.ca; envelope-from=dianne@skoll.ca; receiver=) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=skoll.ca header.i=@skoll.ca header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=canit2 header.b=nNW63xVf Received: from dianne.skoll.ca (dianne.skoll.ca [144.217.161.9]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 111409DCEA2 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 16:34:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from pi4.skoll.ca ([192.168.84.18]) by dianne.skoll.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-22) with ESMTP id 30CFYhZZ2289063 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:34:43 -0500 Received: from gato.skoll.ca (gato.skoll.ca [192.168.83.21]) by pi4.skoll.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Nt7ry4kYyzgd6PY for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:34:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:34:42 -0500 From: Dianne Skoll To: galene@lists.galene.org Message-ID: <20230112103442.14651e37@gato.skoll.ca> In-Reply-To: <871qnz6abi.wl-jch@irif.fr> References: <87sfgg3nmy.wl-jch@irif.fr> <87r0w03ml3.wl-jch@irif.fr> <3EEAFE96-7303-41BA-B7A8-C54C8E07A3EB@rouillier.fr> <87a62o54ts.wl-jch@irif.fr> <39712e61-808a-7dc3-989f-c65410de7129@gmail.com> <878ri76i0n.wl-jch@irif.fr> <875ydb6c8c.wl-jch@irif.fr> <871qnz6abi.wl-jch@irif.fr> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=skoll.ca; h=date:from:to :subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=canit2; bh=Psv9C2dRan 7aLV33uBhvEjhcUus83NT9Gr3RhGyswxI=; b=nNW63xVfAJTSsvZ+0yLb1aPMfK Qf+4sIKee4G6YGImBpcNCOB7/zvNIVa42thinEuBolbbQF4ddUxbMDUNWHyWap4s JBs0HWPYf4J1wRcfrscjLSHlAAsvQRrPpjE9o67Ec3LJ07UvU1V84sPFRBZPtaVb NQ77L4bYeLOd7nijER2O6TewCLyEzrd55XZ1U9mjn2eUipo4XcV2zAAqYE8+5OHj AvHOJOP9cMDmtMy0i9gsYN0/4Z9n0km0mS2XNQpjVR3IEStaqDCLddidgIMWigFM im6hRdBQjTsUHRc9g2NJnVJFm8pTAK58cO0hq/1X1zdEPAaho2ZnhOyGu8Ew== X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 192.168.83.18 X-Spam-Score: undef - relay 192.168.84.18 marked with skip_spam_scan X-CanIt-Geo: No geolocation information available for 192.168.84.18 X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound (inherits from default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available X-CanIt-Archive-Cluster: tWKWaF/NcZkqjWIj0BEJTBHJhwY X-CanIt-Archived-As: base/20230112 / 0197PyH1h Message-ID-Hash: XGDJ6BCJICTQHDGO534ZPYESH6CVX7AF X-Message-ID-Hash: XGDJ6BCJICTQHDGO534ZPYESH6CVX7AF X-MailFrom: dianne@skoll.ca X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.7 Precedence: list Subject: [Galene] Re: Galene in Docker [was: ANNOUNCE: galene-0.6.2] List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Gal=C3=A8ne_videoconferencing_server_discussion_list?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 16:29:05 +0100 Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > I think we're agreeing: running Galene in a Docker container is > possible, but it's not as convenient as with traditional web apps. I > feel it's not worth the hassle, but reasonable people may disagree. If Galene were complicated to set up, that might argue for using Docker to reduce installation headaches... but it's a single executable with a pretty simple set of config files, so I don't see Docker buying much. Running behind an HTTP proxy, though, is very useful. Regards, Dianne.