From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=irif.fr (client-ip=2001:660:3301:8000::1:2; helo=korolev.univ-paris7.fr; envelope-from=jch@irif.fr; receiver=) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=irif.fr header.i=@irif.fr header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=dkim-irif header.b=gAHsMHfD Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76E77A66D8F for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:54:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 43TIsNPu030214; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:54:23 +0200 Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4429A9574B; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:54:23 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=irif.fr; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :subject:subject:references:in-reply-to:message-id:from:from :date:date:received:received; s=dkim-irif; t=1714416861; x= 1715280862; bh=wNmKrWt5Di99ka8x+dZsRWYw+E9QGqm7i2iXo5aetI4=; b=g AHsMHfD+ZmPjYoPleZvpp5IHAFDs/uIMLzPHkVcs9deFCdBLfDqOooOoM/T5Kwj3 I8HZEA1UAedvdtoyEgJq9Cv5DKIURJvd/Y9qNrds0TApoexdDtF1cyBizTmrSFl+ VXmIcKgLxUaLhqxG6DL+gCVxg5KlsJ9MRpEiXDTOTZZr5ievar00l9ioRWGwWTE8 t62vmJuZCpnoa8spGiev/Z4pv9IlQqWv5Tf0Dl874BwVpzX9bnZtfbr9jw8G9EVZ sEjstTKYbfcJWp4YwQUjnroPymFHsty8zEnjPFpwLyn4GK7OQvmZHwCCgXhh5IyD htUCHBV5N6gieON7cF0CQ== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id YwQXIlYCL53l; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:54:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dummy.faircode.eu (unknown [37.175.106.236]) (Authenticated sender: jch@irif.fr) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 420C39579F; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:54:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:54:19 +0200 (GMT+02:00) From: Juliusz Chroboczek To: Sebastien Binet Message-ID: <441d3dfa-e5a8-4e62-8dfc-cd8656846aa2@irif.fr> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Correlation-ID: <441d3dfa-e5a8-4e62-8dfc-cd8656846aa2@irif.fr> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Mon, 29 Apr 2024 20:54:23 +0200 (CEST) X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 662FECDF.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 662FECDF.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/ X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 662FECDF.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000 X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham Message-ID-Hash: 2LRQOPVJW35JBC7YOSIUIADR2GLYWMC4 X-Message-ID-Hash: 2LRQOPVJW35JBC7YOSIUIADR2GLYWMC4 X-MailFrom: jch@irif.fr X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: galene-list X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9 Precedence: list Subject: [Galene] Re: Galene tags & webserver API List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Gal=C3=A8ne_videoconferencing_server_discussion_list?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi, > 1) why does the Galene project tags releases with "galene-X.Y.Z" > instead of the Go-modules compatible "vX.Y.Z" ? > using "vX.Y.Z" would enable nicer-looking 'require' sections in > projects using galene. Go versions obey semver semantics. Galene internals, on the other hand, are not compatible between versions Hence, you cannot depend on a major version of Galene, you need to depend on a precise got hash. In order to keep people from assuming semver semantics, I'm deliberately using an incompatible versioning scheme. > 2) would you be ok with PRs reducing the amount of global variables in > the webserver package? Difficult to say without seeing the PR, but I don't have an objection in principle. -- Juliusz