From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1610644629; bh=aHTqemP+10OiEP6kn0EbjUWQsz3gsHr/ld9/9kBA4SE=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=vk9ME/wo1GlUObsQ/G9wqqO8151qIcsQLsp4T8g7iX2yesBuwNQa4KD530wphVUZI gLvlDJfhkdOn/VULipbYWZPD4ON7hvhTMgYI3UE5ys4IVBTRTK3Hzq+Cab9GRdpP0P GqOq2JWw/Gw+mUC8mGEEMdXnJXG/3HGAFlCiF2ZegtrJpZAeFhmiB36naKprOWDZqm KAiz5vb1byMOtOhTS3aJHUV4XUwGQheL39PdqZ1iYSZuno1mUIr2XSgV7JXUW4JnB6 h8VSzQ/e01kpOfYWpSnOWcNBa9qzC/3EcmFp3moHP2pwIemJHsF9QgojkmWo86t/2x W1953da1w7JwA== To: Michael =?utf-8?Q?Str=C3=B6der?= , galene@lists.galene.org In-Reply-To: <7af360d1-0449-a011-0d99-fd2100c03a7e@stroeder.com> References: <394af17f-0f68-2c37-e9db-043433fd2bb7@stroeder.com> <87r1mnelus.wl-jch@irif.fr> <87mtxbekzy.wl-jch@irif.fr> <871renedzj.wl-jch@irif.fr> <7af360d1-0449-a011-0d99-fd2100c03a7e@stroeder.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:17:08 +0100 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <878s8vsajv.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID-Hash: RQI25UKDQEDCNYDRBCIOJCTX4NUFIVAC X-Message-ID-Hash: RQI25UKDQEDCNYDRBCIOJCTX4NUFIVAC X-MailFrom: toke@toke.dk X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.2 Precedence: list Subject: [Galene] Re: autolock always locks List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Gal=C3=A8ne_videoconferencing_server_discussion_list?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Michael Str=C3=B6der writes: > On 1/14/21 4:26 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >>>>> Are non-ops automatically kicked out when the last op leaves (or when >>>>> the group is locked again with /lock)? >>=20 >>>> No -- the assumption is that they were present at the meeting, so they= 're >>>> authorised to be here. >>=20 >>> RFE: How about an autokick group option. ;-) >>=20 >> Opinions from others? Featuritis or useful feature? > > Just to add some rationale: > > I'm not so much concerned about GDPR issues because this can mostly be > dealt with at orga level. And believe me, I'm concerned about privacy in > general. Otherwise I wouldn't spend my spare time running my own video > conference server. > > But compared to privacy issues I'm much more frightened of someone > abusing my unattended Gal=C3=A8ne installation for something really bad > which does real harm to human beings and triggers police investigation > etc. I was even considering time constraints in my reverse proxy or > similar to tighten it at least a bit. > > So IMO an autokick option would not only be featuritis. So autokick would make sure to empty the room when the last op leaves, is that it? My corporate video chat solution leaves that as an option for me when I leave the room (I can just leave, or I can check a box to kick everyone out when I do). Wouldn't that be more useful than a per-room setting? -Toke