From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023; t=1613823721; bh=uoFaQLByaAPjW7sNoFBg8bPY8ybKASPfbs/+gbv9Bec=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Dai/D3K64yhBwPZYhIyAs2RInluNrnx3kodVzBKRTuLYicQVrUz7yxy7ktZOL9Rd6 osNDve3KSNSRWQLmEBuv3g4JardR2H6adIUtY+h6FgovUEAKUTjCS+kw9fbOT/e6M/ dsOA6kYPt4WCK01gATrXjaQXh+2rSLWOx27zdNAT5iovgi3SNZfZZ3e4pEPknwP1t3 76oIzn0lXnH8P7jGwX5Q1f3maAThZkEvg23jfqCcNjwD/WIn+h+FRrDOQESXY87apE RB3I4v9iLN7PJ/+46G7BC37Rj7VrHcqUmbnWZ6VRLxoqGi98SPSRk/vEdFRm/PBRSk YMzfy7g+vaDMg== To: Michael =?utf-8?Q?Str=C3=B6der?= , galene@lists.galene.org In-Reply-To: <896d5c31-a0cb-50ba-6738-9023b66ec415@stroeder.com> References: <878s7kl6zh.fsf@toke.dk> <8735xsl1mq.fsf@toke.dk> <87lfbk6x6w.wl-jch@irif.fr> <87zh00jjnz.fsf@toke.dk> <87h7m86w05.wl-jch@irif.fr> <1411faaf-6e05-459c-8fc1-523647cfa885@www.fastmail.com> <87sg5r5zml.wl-jch@irif.fr> <87lfbjhsca.fsf@toke.dk> <896d5c31-a0cb-50ba-6738-9023b66ec415@stroeder.com> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 13:22:01 +0100 X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Message-ID: <87czwvhqty.fsf@toke.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID-Hash: IRP4COPCGEI3URBGSSWQ6H3253VU7AFV X-Message-ID-Hash: IRP4COPCGEI3URBGSSWQ6H3253VU7AFV X-MailFrom: toke@toke.dk X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.2 Precedence: list Subject: [Galene] Re: Is the passwd file still needed? List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Gal=C3=A8ne_videoconferencing_server_discussion_list?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Michael Str=C3=B6der writes: > On 2/20/21 12:49 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen wrote: >> Juliusz Chroboczek writes: >>=20 >>>> If breaking changes are still possible, I'd go with "group" for this >>>> concept, and "room" for the current groups. >>> >>> I tend to dislike real-world metaphors. >>=20 >> "Room" does seem to be popular in other services (e.g., matrix.org). > > Yes, "room" is pretty widely used and it looks familiar for users. > > I hope this is not registered as trademark or in a patent. But such an > issue can arise with any term you choose. > >> Otherwise there's "channel" (like in IRC) or "conference"? > > Also good ones. My similar idea would be simply "meeting". > >> Or, getting into sillier territory, "convent", "circle", "seance", >> "gang", "society"? :P > > Or "dungeon" for role players... "Tower"? "Cave"? "Igloo"? "Attic"? "Cubicle"? "Dwelling"? "Hobbit hole"? -Toke