Galène videoconferencing server discussion list archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@irif.fr>
To: Marty Betz <martybetz@gmail.com>
Cc: galene@lists.galene.org
Subject: [Galene] Re: Admin group creation
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 13:08:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iks2jnic.wl-jch@irif.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK0PyndLw7Ss55CD-M_Hun=YSePSErG9T1cULKFqCUWykN7FPg@mail.gmail.com>

Hello,

> In particular I tried to create a group using PUT method with JSON body and it
> works fine for simple groups

Good.

> But if I include a "users" list or a "wildcard-user" value, it fails with a
> "description is not sanitized" error.

Right.  That's by design.

> Why is this "sanitized" check existing in UpdateDescription().

The API splits the group description into two parts:

  - the "sanitised" group description itself;
  - the users' database.

Every user, in turn, is split into two parts:

  - the user description;
  - the password.

So in order to create a group, you need to make 1 + 2n requests:

  - create the group: PUT /api/v0/.groups/groupname
  - for every user
     - create the user: PUT /api/v0/.groups/groupname/.users/username
     - set the password: PUT /api/v0/.groups/groupname/.users/username/.password

You use .wildcard-user for the wildcard user.

The main reason why I've used this organisation is that it makes
fine-grained access control possible: for example, a normal (non-admin)
user is allowed to change their own password, but they're of course not
allowed to change the rest of the group description.  Conversely, an admin
is allowed to change the group description, but they're not allowed to GET
a password.

(There are other advantages, but they're less important, so I won't bore
you with them here.)

The main drawback, of course, is that it makes some operations
inefficient.  For example, in order to display the list of users together
with their persmissions, you need to do this:

  GET /api/v0/.groups/groupname/.users/
  for every user
      GET /api/v0/.groups/groupname/.users/username

(It also makes the operation non-atomic: if a user is deleted between the
first and the subsequent GET, then you'll unexpectedly get a 404 error.
Oh, well.)

If it becomes a problem in the future, I'll extend the API with operations
over collections, but until we gain more experience with the API, I'd
rather stick to simple operations only.

By the way: the main user of the API right now is the galenectl program,
which you're find in the Galene sources.  Feel free to copy-paste code
from there.

I hope this helps,

-- Juliusz Chroboczek

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-02 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-01 23:17 [Galene] " Marty Betz
2024-12-02 12:08 ` Juliusz Chroboczek [this message]
2024-12-02 17:28   ` [Galene] " Marty Betz
2024-12-02 18:00     ` Marty Betz
2024-12-02 19:12       ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2024-12-02 19:56         ` Marty Betz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.galene.org/postorius/lists/galene.lists.galene.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87iks2jnic.wl-jch@irif.fr \
    --to=jch@irif.fr \
    --cc=galene@lists.galene.org \
    --cc=martybetz@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox