From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=irif.fr (client-ip=2001:660:3301:8000::1:2; helo=korolev.univ-paris7.fr; envelope-from=jch@irif.fr; receiver=) Received: from korolev.univ-paris7.fr (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3301:8000::1:2]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AF097CCAC3 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:49:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [81.194.30.253]) by korolev.univ-paris7.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/relay1/82085) with ESMTP id 10HGn945032533; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:49:09 +0100 Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17304FE6AB; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:49:09 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at math.univ-paris-diderot.fr Received: from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id 9AVkjoaMMTPg; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:49:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from pirx.irif.fr (unknown [78.194.40.74]) (Authenticated sender: jch) by mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD5DBFE6A8; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:49:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:49:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87sg6z8q64.wl-jch@irif.fr> From: Juliusz Chroboczek To: Michael =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Str=F6der?= In-Reply-To: References: <87eeijah44.wl-jch@irif.fr> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.1 Mule/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (korolev.univ-paris7.fr [194.254.61.138]); Sun, 17 Jan 2021 17:49:09 +0100 (CET) X-Miltered: at korolev with ID 60046A85.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 60046A85.000 from mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/null/mailhub.math.univ-paris-diderot.fr/ X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 60046A85.000 on korolev.univ-paris7.fr : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000 X-j-chkmail-Status: Ham Message-ID-Hash: 2WTPL52X5B4I5I76C54BH36XWN4XMEMJ X-Message-ID-Hash: 2WTPL52X5B4I5I76C54BH36XWN4XMEMJ X-MailFrom: jch@irif.fr X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header CC: galene@lists.galene.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.2 Precedence: list Subject: [Galene] Re: Should volume start at <100%? List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Gal=C3=A8ne_videoconferencing_server_discussion_list?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Given the many ways volume can be adjusted/mixed on the client system it > is IMO not worth the effort to think about a default != 100%. The issue is with a large meeting (say, 20 people), where one person is significantly less audible than the others. Currently, you need to reduce the volume of 19 people in order to make that one person audible.