From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp001-out.apm-internet.net (smtp001-out.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.222]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFE17A56449 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:46:35 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 519 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2024 11:46:35 -0000 X-APM-Out-ID: 17085159950051 X-APM-Authkey: 255286/0(253943/0) 264 Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp001.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 21 Feb 2024 11:46:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73269868DA; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:46:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zimbra003.verygoodemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra003.verygoodemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10026) with ESMTP id LdD796RpMooS; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:46:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [192.67.4.100]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 530AF82D8E; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:46:35 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.400.31\)) From: Tim Panton In-Reply-To: <87o7ca6ov1.wl-jch@irif.fr> Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 11:46:24 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <87o7ca6ov1.wl-jch@irif.fr> To: Juliusz Chroboczek X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.400.31) Message-ID-Hash: QQU4JBE7XBJ7H6AT2UKQGUVPILW4SLDN X-Message-ID-Hash: QQU4JBE7XBJ7H6AT2UKQGUVPILW4SLDN X-MailFrom: tim@pi.pe X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: Dave Taht , galene@lists.galene.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9 Precedence: list Subject: [Galene] Re: Latency and jitter [was: WHIP problems...] List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Gal=C3=A8ne_videoconferencing_server_discussion_list?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > On 21 Feb 2024, at 11:25, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >=20 >> Less humorously I am really interested in video quality and responses >> to latency and jitter in an application like this. >=20 > Native Galene clients and WHIP clients use the same codepath for RTP, = so > I'd expect latency and jitter to be exactly the same for WHIP and = native. >=20 > I too would be interested in latency results for Galene, but such = results > are better when put in context, so somebody would need to set up a lab > where they can also measure the latency of Zoom and Jitsi. It should > preferably be somebody else than me, since I have an obvious bias, but = I'd > be glad to assist the person doing the testing. I=E2=80=99ve hacked together a glass-to-glass video latency measurement = device. I=E2=80=99ll be talking about it and publishing the how-to in April. Happy to do a few tests on Galene and other platforms when I have a = stable build. (Currently it looks like safari is 1 frame faster than chrome ;-) ) T. >=20 > -- Juliusz > _______________________________________________ > Galene mailing list -- galene@lists.galene.org > To unsubscribe send an email to galene-leave@lists.galene.org