From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: galene@lists.galene.org
Cc: T H Panton <tim@pi.pe>
Subject: [Galene] using up more ports in ipv6 for better congestion control
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2021 08:15:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw58HfxwGTi6dwT+rGRYRrWQmBsaGatCmmNDc+KYPRLG+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
tim panton wrote me just now on linked in:
"It is still possible. Just set bundle-policy to max-compat and you'll
get one stream for audio and one for video. Turn off rtcp-mux and
you'll get 4 ports (voice, video, voice-RTCP, video-RTCP) - But your
ability to connect will drop significantly (according to Google's
data) and your connection setup time will increase. Even with port
muxing congestion control is still possible, it just works
_differently_ - which arguably it should, because realtime video has
quite different needs from streaming or file transfer. Happy to have a
chat about this...."
(so... chatting via email is preferred for me)
I am also under the impression that the congestion control
notifications in rtcp are essentially obsolete in the rfc, mandating a
500ms interval instead of something sane, like a frame?
My other fantasy is to somehow start using udplite for more things.
The context for this of course is my never ending quest to have an IP
based video and audio streaming system good enough to have a band
playing with each other across town.
--
Latest Podcast:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/
Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC
next reply other threads:[~2021-07-10 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 15:15 Dave Taht [this message]
2021-07-10 15:19 ` [Galene] " Dave Taht
2021-07-10 16:36 ` T H Panton
2021-07-10 16:48 ` Dave Taht
2021-07-11 11:19 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2021-07-15 14:17 ` Sean DuBois
2021-07-16 1:36 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2021-07-16 14:25 ` Sean DuBois
2021-07-15 16:26 ` T H Panton
2021-07-16 1:37 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2021-07-16 14:46 ` T H Panton
2021-07-16 17:48 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.galene.org/postorius/lists/galene.lists.galene.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA93jw58HfxwGTi6dwT+rGRYRrWQmBsaGatCmmNDc+KYPRLG+g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=galene@lists.galene.org \
--cc=tim@pi.pe \
--subject='Re: [Galene] using up more ports in ipv6 for better congestion control' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox