[Galene] Re: Anonymous access

[Francis Bolduc <fbolduc@gmail.com>]

> I, for one, find it easier to use galenectl than to edit JSON files.
> I also find it easier to write a script using galenectl than jq.  But both
> ways remain supported, of course.


My only gripe with galenectl is that it needs galene to run to work
(at least from my understanding of it).

I understand the utility of changing configs on a live server. But
have you considered having galenectl work directly on the JSON files
and then send SIGHUP to the running galene process (if any) to reload
configs?


Regards,
Francis