From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mxtls1.mailbox.org (mxtls1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.213]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6995D7E77AA for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:30:40 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secure.mailbox.org header.i=@secure.mailbox.org header.b=EuOrSPuw; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=secure.mailbox.org header.i=@secure.mailbox.org header.b=KVHE+ata Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mxtls1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07EC540241 for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:30:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= secure.mailbox.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:content-type:content-type:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date :received; s=mail20150812; t=1613655037; bh=D8M6bRoDUo9uOsjlM72m iFeV18BtAf4g+Jr5/JdhrqA=; b=EuOrSPuwEXoqRpmre2f51763QRIxzJu+MV+F VG4J2QcwT8z4mz9v0WGDDhFq0eiBEFX3pr20iH7yaoI9gF2PV/UqzLzVod0HgFUq M3c0SCGyNl62jHj2sWxdxEGXdv2jeD3/ZHfLfecMQFgwJ1fudbEmppAPfHRW6UP3 rHoz0OnwY4ssfInzViF8krcSYEOucQ6PvtiPlx0vQW3Dl+HlivAwEvUPhKwjF7UG 7SSDMnrox25QaPqZYfMfPh8QDQqjmZVn0hl2/lkvUPdJiE/AN+aSJBxdF85yYQBV zKNHeE1ATgxvZ60+sPJg9mAvlRWSsGLskigQ8meo+s/m5oRtgg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secure.mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1613655038; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YOTLmbbOdJL0YMS4+affjBmWgpRQnI0XseopdSyTKJI=; b=KVHE+ata5bOic9RjNafgaAZkqg/PxaQZUNK9dGHkdiL376TQGyBS2ntYKA+q5910HaMrEb jaVat3ZIfobk3dC8k0kwBpAJKpbf3VJ/3N3of90gRaVCTJd8QJAMMqf1rbRQid1LF0X9yM gjKV5Ey7zwsrI1DWrEtKsOevF40+hsqLTfxK2e9DSv5bOIx1vPYpm/lzp7BiasguUNw1vb ryNUIMZPakVnZRrzv+VwTJjkJusAqqYoM6R7/lrUtWmET5wiNV6ahHW3ry0ejNCOELoRad iC8JoTDjSZ+nSqIdutwjwxM9VxznuTP7QZnbcIl/vAoOVDvfn6Albzeu3sBjDw== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter04.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.122]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id kSHIji0JnlLV for ; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:30:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:30:33 +0100 From: HWJ To: Galene Message-ID: References: <5d87b0c8-6581-a92f-67f6-18fd8074d1c1@stroeder.com> <87lfbmvksw.wl-jch@irif.fr> <96c6497bb7757c121817c7999a591e4f@nexedi.com> <878s7lva1d.wl-jch@irif.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <878s7lva1d.wl-jch@irif.fr> X-MBO-SPAM-Probability: X-Rspamd-Score: -1.19 / 15.00 / 15.00 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0D807185F X-Rspamd-UID: 7e68be Message-ID-Hash: J44CO6THSR5WRMXEQHMDYJVANJTIUJ5M X-Message-ID-Hash: J44CO6THSR5WRMXEQHMDYJVANJTIUJ5M X-MailFrom: hwj+galene@secure.mailbox.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.2 Precedence: list Subject: [Galene] Re: accept4: too many open files List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Gal=C3=A8ne_videoconferencing_server_discussion_list?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: >Opinions? Should Gal=E8ne raise the limit itself, or should it respect any >limit set by the user? I'd prefer Gal=E8ne to just emit a warning, e.g.: consumed 90% of available file descriptors Don't rob the sysadmins of their jobs ;) -HWJ