From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-202.mailbox.org (mout-p-202.mailbox.org [80.241.56.172]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDB7C8DAB50 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:23:39 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=DbEuyXho; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=K8vsTxHh Received: from smtp102.mailbox.org (smtp102.mailbox.org [80.241.60.233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-384) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-202.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HhM3Z43bMzQk12 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:23:38 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type:content-type :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject:from:from :date:date:received; s=mail20150812; t=1635603814; bh=pzaTeB99wk o4VTQ4DH9rXnvfT1v3ZVEbqG0nd8Ht3sc=; b=DbEuyXho3kizYIGBX2J4m8reOg tIwqv2E1Yca9GDtGIcJGsrRtDGTZxRwvMgkF9Bbo6spLY0l6yQz7l9XU+n+OjmQA WRhX7Ph7zxoFW/vYekZRmPV1W2Mz55X15/UlipYyTl/sIxaaXRa1D0XeOqCl54lP hHsKMRsKtnx0JT/EX1PaDzkpgMxfKmfAEHFXHa5YC+UhL2+RqJfOIzMPS0kLLJzc 1y98tsWZULhSSC64aKGSD2B2nUp8lEYIqFXbeReca5Ndpltms0WA35SS6O/5dZH6 OX/1c5Yh1FN/m+VKRmgIOrG4rsi5N7aRTNDxpx6ggPKComJmcEK/Ivk7px0g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1635603816; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pzaTeB99wko4VTQ4DH9rXnvfT1v3ZVEbqG0nd8Ht3sc=; b=K8vsTxHhqRimGEFcJ9y1uQRSUuKsjKfJrH0HzfzBufoXmFcKTyosLyPyNd/Y4iwYJIjpOG hk4otzfSI+uAIYycHNnkkjNsG2SMGTsd5fkex0j6guMoE3JMKowIPx1vyshu5Ga1h/3WZx CIFWxJ8rORSJD1peKRQ4+R99Rzx64qjPuNgTwd16pD8dJMpouveFGgQo9MGnOPnRLLJAuq H/lq7qZMS6+zIaYFiWNz6g39QQFsmLQ4rDtc86f61xI7yA06Ll93QcOoPzWrLci41Z8bnb FLkykPRkb7/UVctb2REE5RJtQKtJfOJgUAODzQxM8up7YL1EwsJm6FosU3ieZA== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:22:58 +0200 From: HWJ To: galene@lists.galene.org Message-ID: References: <8735oitzbd.wl-jch@irif.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2D1FA5AF X-MailFrom: hwj+galene@mailbox.org X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation Message-ID-Hash: IUOXMPH3A7T7QYJRJVWACRNXRRHYEUVX X-Message-ID-Hash: IUOXMPH3A7T7QYJRJVWACRNXRRHYEUVX X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Oct 2021 16:38:57 +0200 X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.4 Precedence: list Subject: [Galene] Re: Is Go 1.15 old enough? List-Id: =?utf-8?q?Gal=C3=A8ne_videoconferencing_server_discussion_list?= Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The library that I'm using for token autentication depends on Go 1.15. > This means that it won't be possible to compile Galene with Go 1.13 or > 1.14 any longer without some patching. SGTM.