[Galene] Re: Docker image

[Cell <cellophan@kn1ght.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1672 bytes --]

Yep. That's my plan. Work in progress :)

On 28 December 2020 10:21:16 CET, "Antonin Décimo" <antonin.decimo@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hi!
>
>If your image is using a pre-compiled version of Galène, you’ll lack
>portability across distributions and architectures. You should build
>Galène and run it inside the Dockerfile. You could even use a layered
>Dockerfile so that Galène is build in one image, then copied in the
>second image and run from there.
>
>Starting from scratch is a bad idea.
>
>I’d use instead the Golang Docker image. It is well documented:
>
>    https://hub.docker.com/_/golang
>
>A simple workflow would be to have the Dockerfile inside the Galène
>repo and use the example Dockerfile:
>
>    FROM golang:1.15
>
>    WORKDIR /go/src/galene
>    COPY . .
>    
>    RUN go get -d -v ./...
>    RUN go install -v ./...
>    
>    CMD ["galene"]
>
>Or you could build a "self-hosting" Dockerfile that download the
>package and its dependencies itself (this one is untested, I don't
>have the bandwidth right now):
>
>    FROM golang:1.15
>    
>    WORKDIR /go/src/galene
>    COPY data groups static ./
>    
>    RUN go get -d -v github.com/jech/galene
>    RUN go install -v github.com/jech/galene
>    
>    CMD ["galene"]
>
>The Golang project provides images for Linux, Windows, macOS, and
>various architectures that you can use as base images.
>
>Once an image is build, it is *not* portable to other systems or
>architectures; but the build script (the Dockerfile) may be portable.
>For Windows, nanoserver is the lightest image, windowsservercore is a
>bit more featured.
>
>-- Antonin

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2016 bytes --]