Galène videoconferencing server discussion list archives
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Muscariello <muscariello@ieee.org>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, galene@lists.galene.org
Subject: [Galene] Re: [Bloat] testing latency under load on webrtc with galene?
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 17:01:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH8sseQ-vGYJdrj+6mmz++L2MrQ4SvfEh4Ja49Tx_mTUVXJG2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5aOdEFY0+5uc0v6pkLwOed+bp2S91-TJFLHZZ0_Gtq5w@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1958 bytes --]

Dave,

we have done extensive WebRTC (and several other online meeting
apps) testing lately and this paper
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9153228 reports a
methodology for WebRTC based on Chromium and Selenium Grid and
as test orchestrator Jitsi Torture.

I would avoid feeding clients with BBB as video as it is not
representative of a meeting as encoders are optimized for
different kinds of video. There are several video samples
out there.

We have scaled up clients to hundreds with this methodology.
The paper is short so many details have been omitted but there
are not many other options to do this kind of test at scale.

Luca







describes the methodology



On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:15 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:

> Given that we have a worldwide network of flent servers...
>
> Given how easy galene is to hack on... and a 10 minute install...
>
> given some webrtc scripting... a few more stats... some javascript...
> skull sweat... funding...
>
> It seems plausible to be able to construct a suite of tests that could
> indeed track jitter
> delay and loss across the internet over webrtc. Perpetually uploading
> bigbuckbunny or some
> other suitable movie might be an option, but I have a fondness for
> extracting a sub 30 second segment from  "Max Headroom", which if
> those here have not seen it, predicted much of the fine mess we're all
> in now.
>
> I guess my question is mostly, is a "headless" test feasible? In the
> context of samknow's lack of webrtc test... lowpowered hw....
>
> --
> "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
> relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
>
> dave@taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4442 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-02 16:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-02  1:14 [Galene] " Dave Taht
2021-03-02 14:59 ` [Galene] " Jeroen van Veen
2021-03-02 16:01 ` Luca Muscariello [this message]
2021-03-04 19:09   ` [Galene] Re: [Bloat] " Sean DuBois
2021-03-04 21:22     ` Luca Muscariello

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.galene.org/postorius/lists/galene.lists.galene.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAH8sseQ-vGYJdrj+6mmz++L2MrQ4SvfEh4Ja49Tx_mTUVXJG2w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=muscariello@ieee.org \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=galene@lists.galene.org \
    --subject='[Galene] Re: [Bloat] testing latency under load on webrtc with galene?' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox